Objective. We apply the high-reliability organization (HRO) paradigm to the diagnostic process, outlining challenges to enacting HRO principles in diagnosis and offering solutions for how diagnostic process stakeholders can overcome these barriers. Background. Evidence shows that healthcare is starting to organize for higher reliability by employing various principles and practices of HRO. These hold promise for enhancing safer care, but there has been little consideration of the challenges that clinicians and healthcare systems face while enacting HRO principles in the diagnostic process. To effectively deploy the HRO perspective, these barriers must be seriously considered. Method. We review key principles of the HRO paradigm, the diagnostic errors and harms that potentially can be prevented by its enactment, the challenges that clinicians and healthcare systems face in executing various principles and practices, and possible solutions that clinicians and organizational leaders can take to overcome these challenges and barriers. Results. Our analyses reveal multiple challenges including the inherent diagnostic uncertainty; the lack of diagnosis-focused performance feedback; the fact that diagnosis is often a solo, rather than team, activity; the tendency to simplify the diagnostic process; and professional and institutional status hierarchies. But these challenges are not insurmountable-there are strategies and solutions available to overcome them. Conclusion. The HRO lens offers some important ideas for how the safety of the diagnostic process can be improved. Application. The ideas proposed here can be enacted by both individual clinicians and healthcare leaders; both are necessary for making systematic progress in enhancing diagnostic performance.
Commentaire du Dr Marius Laurent (PAQS)
- Les cinq « principes des HRO » sont une fois de plus explicités et commentés du point de vue de l’erreur de diagnostic (préoccupation de l’échec, résistance aux simplifications, sensibilité aux opérations, déférence à l’expertise et engagement envers la résilience). Des obstacles sont identifiés d’emblée, liés à l’incertitude inhérente au processus diagnostique, qui n’est pas réductible : le zéro faute n’est pas de ce monde. L’absence de feed-back, et plus largement l’absence d’une véritable culture d’équipe autour du processus diagnostique sont probablement les faiblesses les plus criantes. L’article établit une communication explicite entre les prescriptions de la National Academy of Medicine et les principes des HRO sans faire nécessairement de ceux-ci des prescriptions intangibles. C’est un beau programme, intelligemment présenté pour quiconque voudrait améliorer la manière dont le processus diagnostique se déroule dans son hôpital.
Yousef EA, Sutcliffe KM, McDonald KM, Newman-Toker DE. Crossing academic boundaries for diagnostic safety: 10 complex challenges and potential solutions from clinical perspectives and high-reliability organizing principles. Human Factors. 2022;64(1):6-20. Doi : 10.1177/0018720821996187.